Scholars sometimes struggle with adverb use. So, for high-level guidance.......
Rich Furman, MFA, MSW, PhD Insightful, Strengths-Based Coaching for Scholars and Leaders https://sites.google.com/view/richfurmancoaching/testimonials
Tuesday, January 16, 2018
Monday, January 15, 2018
Old School Instruction on How to Use Commas
Many scholars struggle with comma use. I hope this video, old school that it is, helps.
Sunday, January 14, 2018
Friday, January 12, 2018
Friday Challenge: Short, Focused Writing Block
Its been a while since I have posted a Friday writing challenge. Here is a simple one.
Find one, small task to do on an article or your primary writing project. When I say small task, I mean specific; what is one paragraph where you can enter and generate new words. You don't have to complete the task, just enter it.
Set your timer for ten minutes, no more.
Breath for a minute.
Go.
How did you do?
Find one, small task to do on an article or your primary writing project. When I say small task, I mean specific; what is one paragraph where you can enter and generate new words. You don't have to complete the task, just enter it.
Set your timer for ten minutes, no more.
Breath for a minute.
Go.
How did you do?
Monday, December 18, 2017
Want to, have to?
Consider a piece of scholarship that you want to work on, not one that you have to work on. What would it mean to work on this now, in a manner that does not increase your stress, but instead feels life-enhancing?
Sunday, December 17, 2017
Everyone Has an Opinion, But....
Every once in a while, I have to stop following someone on twitter. It does not happen often and is never for posts about political opinions or disciplinary differences that I do not care for, or other such disagreements. I try to allow space for such the diversity of ideas.
Yet, when I read scholars pontificating about writing or writing productivity, in an authoritative tone seeming to imply expertise about such, and when they clearly have written very little, I just have to disengage.
There is a huge recycling of myths about the scholarly writing process that I find a wee bit offensive. Also, when someone tries to position themslves an expert on psychosocial barriers that blocks scholars in their writing, but they really have not worked through such things themselves, and are not trained in helping people change, I just lose patience.
I do not mean to sound snippy or snide, or like a know-it-all. For twenty years, I have viewed myself as student of what it means to write and publish- I still have much to learn. Heck, that is why I am studying for an MFA in Nonfiction at the age of fifty-two!
However, I have learned a few things from my years of writing and publishing, and from working intensively with other scholars as a mentor or coach.Yet, I am also not one to "suffer fools lightly." As such, it is best for me to just "step off" at times.
The lesson here, to the degree that I have one, is watch the advice you are taking. Make sure you critically evaluate where advice comes from, and the impact that preforming such advice has had on scholars, over time. Over a long period of time. The goal is to develop sustainable practices.
And this post I end, with....
IMHO
Yet, when I read scholars pontificating about writing or writing productivity, in an authoritative tone seeming to imply expertise about such, and when they clearly have written very little, I just have to disengage.
There is a huge recycling of myths about the scholarly writing process that I find a wee bit offensive. Also, when someone tries to position themslves an expert on psychosocial barriers that blocks scholars in their writing, but they really have not worked through such things themselves, and are not trained in helping people change, I just lose patience.
I do not mean to sound snippy or snide, or like a know-it-all. For twenty years, I have viewed myself as student of what it means to write and publish- I still have much to learn. Heck, that is why I am studying for an MFA in Nonfiction at the age of fifty-two!
However, I have learned a few things from my years of writing and publishing, and from working intensively with other scholars as a mentor or coach.Yet, I am also not one to "suffer fools lightly." As such, it is best for me to just "step off" at times.
The lesson here, to the degree that I have one, is watch the advice you are taking. Make sure you critically evaluate where advice comes from, and the impact that preforming such advice has had on scholars, over time. Over a long period of time. The goal is to develop sustainable practices.
And this post I end, with....
IMHO
Tuesday, December 5, 2017
Reflective Colleague Assessment Tool
Many
years ago, I started working on a reflective self-assessment tool designed to
explore male friendships. Today, a client and I were discussion the importance of
relationships in her life, and I thought of that work I had started many years
ago. After taking a quick look at an old brainstorming document, I realized
this might be a valuable aid toward helping academic assess the quality of
their colleague relationships. I present this to you as a crude, undeveloped,
certainly untested instrument that you may wish to consider as an exercise. It
is a reflective tool, designed to help you consider who supports you, and who
you support. Use the scale subjectively, and only as means of initial assessment
and tracking, should you wish to engage in some work based upon your
reflections.
Reflective
Colleague Assessment
1) List all
the colleagues you currently have in your life.
2) List the colleagues
who are important to you, but are not currently part of your life.
3) Rank the colleagues
according to the categories listed below.
4) Note
which colleagues you will like to move from one category to another.
5) Brainstorm
what you might need to do to move a colleague to another category.
6) What
actions can you take to make this happen?
7) What
barriers and blocks might get in your way (internal and external)?
8) What
actions will you now commit to doing?
9) Spend
some time reflecting on this process.
|
Excellent
|
Good
|
Average
|
Below Average
|
Poor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)