When things are not going well, it is natural (well, human) to ask "what is wrong?" What is wrong; the focus of Freud, most of your doctors, your mechanic, dishwasher repair person, and the costumer service manager that you complained to.
I am not publishing enough? What is wrong
I am not writing enough? What is wrong.
I have ideas that I cannot organize? What is wrong.
I get so anxious that I can't write. What is wrong.
I beat myself up so much. What is wrong with me that I do this.. What is wrong, what is wrong, what is wrong.
And yes, you are wise to attend to "what is wrong."
Yet, if you have made it to a PhD, no less through a PhD, you have a thousand more "what is rights" (writes) than you do "what is wrongs."
You are a bundle of capacities, strengths and resiliencies, and "goodnessess."
Fine Rich, all well and good, but I want to fix what is wrong! My strengths are fine, so I can leave them alone.
Well, my fine feathered friend- maximizing what is right is one of the most effective ways of resolving what is wrong.
Let me say this another way-maximize your strengths in service of mitigating your weaknesses.
Or another- the more you focus on your strengths, and continue to developed and grow them, better you will do.
And finally-build your strengths for greatness. Reduce your weaknesses for fine-tuning functionality.
Nuff' said.